|
| Recent
Articles |
WDSL & Webresource.axd
Various WDSL (Web Service Description Language) entities exist in a web server.The file is meant to describe what services are available and what the...
Capabilities Of Sybase SqlAnywhere With .NET...
.NET developers can add the powerful capabilities of SQL Anywhere to their applications by using .NET programming interfaces and web services. SQL Anywhere Studio makes the most of the services provided by...
Customer-Lead, Trust-based Value Generation Services
This article explains how an enterprise can leverage increased value generation, thereby aiding competitive advantage, by adoption of the `Enterprise Value...
Web Services, Contracts And Copyright
What's the Deal With Contracts, Copyright and Web Related Services? If you're the client, make sure you include the following steps when hiring a service provider to ensure you don't get involved in a mess...
Should Google Offer Its Own Services As A Tip?
I have been watching the latest spat against Google for offering "tips" on services and products that they offer, when some web searches are input into Google.
What Is A Portal?
Among other things, a post today by my friend Scott Karp over at Publishing 2.0 has helped crystallized for me just how inadequate a lot of the terminology is that we're using for Web services and communities - and...
|
|
04.12.07
Bad or Good? - Wrong Question
 By Mathew Ingram
Aaron Swartz is an interesting guy. One of the co-
founders of Reddit, the Digg-like recommendation engine that was recently bought by the Conde Nast magazine-publishing empire, his blog often has long and thoughtful posts with a refreshingly different perspective. His latest is no exception: In a post entitled “Everything Good is Bad For You,” he writes about what he sees as the downside of Web services like Twitter, and even Reddit itself.
 After
Reddit became popular, Aaron says, people came up to him and said how much they
enjoyed using it, but also talked about how it had destroyed their productivity
and consumed their lives. Many people have said the same about YouTube or MySpace
or Facebook — and how they spend all their time updating their profile or checking
their friend requests or scanning for pictures — and Twitter.com
is the latest addition to the family of time-wasting, attention-destroying applications,
Aaron suggests. He quotes Cory Doctorow as saying: “It’s like watching someone
shovel Mars Bars into his gob while telling you how much he hates chocolate.”
Aaron argues that Reddit and Twitter and other tools are te equivalent of chocolate
bars.
Peter Caputa at pc4media makes an even stronger argument, saying the tech blogosphere is “just a bunch of surface skimming idiots in a bar w/ no alcohol, and that it’s “mostly Michael Arrington’s fault.” At some point, he says, companies have to “gaze beyond your own navel and come up with a business model; an application that connects people in meaningful ways to accomplish goals beyond instant self-gratification.”
I think Aaron and Peter are both right, in a sense. It’s easy to get consumed by things like Twitter or Facebook or even instant messaging for that matter, and they are a little like junk food — fast, sugar high, illusion of being full, etc. And yet, I can’t agree completely. Why? As a commenter notes on Aaron’s blog, a lot of novels are crap too, and probably just as bad for you (don’t get me started on television). Is reading a blog any worse than reading a potboiler detective novel? I don’t know, but it’s a pretty close race.
In the end, I think a lot of the things we’re seeing are experiments, and no one really knows whether they will actually be useful or not, or what they really *mean* in the larger sense. I do know that things like Twitter and Facebook and MySpace connect people in ways that novels do not — I’m not saying that’s necessarily better. Just saying.
Comments
About the Author:
Mathew Ingram is a technology writer and blogger for the Globe and Mail, a national newspaper based in Toronto, and also writes about the Web and media at www.mathewingram.com/work and www.mathewingram.com/media.
|
